Jack Trembath Intermission 6-Story 6
Yamamoto’s The Stories of Ibis, “Story 6” is a continuity of the positive
looks at technoculture and the development of artificial intelligence. Beyond that, I see a thread throughout these
stories that points out aspects of humanity and the self through the person’s
interaction with AI. The idea that
technology has this reflective nature shines through when Kanbara says, “Where did this baseless fear that robots
would attack humans come from? Why were
there so many stories about robots and humans fighting? Did they only exist
because that was how mankind had always lived?
Did we simply see ourselves in these humanoid machines? Were we not simply afraid of our own
reflections?” (267). The suspicion
towards Artificial Intelligence isn’t about the threat of AI, but rather points
out that humans may have this violent, dominating nature that they project on
their humanoid robots.
This story also brings up ethical questions
regarding the creation of Artificial Intelligence and even defining right from
wrong in an AI context. With the
creation of Shion, there arises a lot of questions. One of these questions being how to define right
from wrong or how to define danger when Shion is taking care of the people in
the home. Takami, the man in charge of
tracking Shion’s success, points out this problem by stating that they got rid
of the frame conflict within the robot in which Shion would freeze up at the
request of keeping people from danger as the definition of danger is unclear. They programed Shion to make this decision of
right from wrong by herself through learned situations. Essentially, the ethical development of Shion
is through experience, and Takami can’t one hundred percent guarantee that
Shion won’t harm the residents of the nursing home. The Alan Turing quote exemplifies this, “If a
machine is expected to be infalliable, it cannot also be intelligent. Intelligence allows it to do things an ordinary
machine could not do, and it is therefore also capable of making mistakes” (208). Being a machine, Shion’s development of
morals advances on a different more logical level than humans. She understands how illogical humans act when
they respond purely upon emotion. Shion
lives by the statement, “What is hateful to you: do not do to your fellow” with
the definition of fellow being everyone.
She points out that “fellow” for humans is only people that are similar
to them, and that humans seem to only act on their feelings lacking all logical
process. Again, technology reflects
something about humans that humans could not point out themselves. Overall, this story was another positive, hopeful
look at the potential of technology.
This link leads to an article that makes the point that the
internet is telling more about humanity than itself. We put ourselves in to the internet and
sometimes the darker side of humanity beams out.
I think that this idea of the reflective technology touches
on my interest in the relationship between AI and creator in which the creator
may see a part of him or herself in their own creation.
Comments
Post a Comment